The way I practice journaling is through an unapologetic stream of consciousness. Even if I sense my
argument is wrong, incorrect, or flawed, I will continue it, following it to its base component/discourse.
Because of this, I urge any reader to not take these excerpts as current opinions, and do not let them
define me. Any of them may be cast off, edited, changed, or examined further after its writing. Putting
thoughts on paper is one of the greatest ways we can self-analyze and change for the better. I encourage you
to practice the same.To assist in the reader's criticism, I have assigned each excerpt from its time of writing, a scale of satisfaction I have with the excerpt as a whole. Lower means I see it as wrong or flawed, higher means I see it typically as more axiomatic.
architecture intelligence
3/3
Architecture can only orient a design through pure functionalism for honest social justice and consideration, or complete abandonment of social ideas for something purely beautiful.
Presented with a project that is both beautiful and claims to be socially equitable, the focus on a social function was ALWAYS after the fact, the liberalism of modern architectural practice does not truthfully focus their craft on facilitating cultural growth and social equity.
"A computer can never make management decisions because a computer can never be held accountable." "A computer can never make design decisions because a computer can never be held accountable."
An error in AI cannot be rectified by a designers personal growth or change, but only by shareholders, CEOs, and individuals with our capital interest. Due too human nature, the most capital is found in beautiful design, not ethical or social design, thus an error made by an AI in a design which holds ground in social affections, will never be rectified or prevented from happening again.
Opportunities for beauty orientated work can be found in art. In design holds much more social importance due to higher prevalence and nonconsensual interaction.
AI generation soing is uniform and does not weight for both general practicality and social needs. AI will not take the same considerations as a competent designer.